Your cart is currently empty!
CONTROLLING THE WILD WEST (2006)
Visit Video Documentation: https://vimeo.com/33815346
Controlling the Wild West is an interactive installation that explores the relationship between human movement, mechanical systems, and the construction of visual narratives. Using ultrasonic rangefinders, the installation detects viewers’ positions and movements within the exhibition space, translating their presence into signals that activate servo motors connected to wooden dowel rods. Attached to these rods are figures cut from a photographic reproduction book of paintings by American Western artist Frederick Remington. As viewers move through the space, the figures are set into motion, animated at varying speeds, rhythms, and directions.
Through this interaction, familiar scenes and characters from the mythology of the American West are displaced from their original compositions and reconfigured through movement. The resulting mechanical choreography produces shifting relationships between figures, opening up alternative readings of the scenes and disrupting the fixed narratives embedded in the source imagery. The viewer does not simply observe the work but becomes an active participant in its operation, influencing how and when its components move.
The installation deliberately exposes its own mechanisms and processes. Its motors, rods, sensors, structural elements, and control systems remain visible, allowing viewers to encounter the work not as a concealed technological spectacle but as an accessible, functioning apparatus. This transparency makes the act of interaction inseparable from the experience of the artwork: viewers can recognize how their movements are translated into mechanical actions and how those actions generate the evolving composition.
As viewers navigate the installation, their movements also affect how they encounter one another. The work gradually operates as a spatial interface in which individual positions and gestures influence the movement of the images, the unfolding of the narrative, and the relationships formed among people sharing the space. In this sense, Controlling the Wild West shifts the Western scene from a static representation into a responsive environment—one in which narrative, perception, and participation are continually renegotiated through the interaction of bodies, images, and machines.
Philosophical Significance of Controlling the Wild West (2006)
Controlling the Wild West can be understood as an exploration of how perception, agency, narrative, and technological systems shape the ways individuals experience and interpret the world. At its most immediate level, the installation transforms viewers’ physical movements into mechanical actions that animate figures drawn from Frederick Remington’s paintings of the American West. Yet beneath this interactive mechanism lies a more complex inquiry: What does it mean to control an image, a narrative, or a space, and who—or what—actually exercises that control?
The title itself establishes an important conceptual tension. The phrase Controlling the Wild West suggests an attempt to impose order upon something historically imagined as untamed, unpredictable, and resistant to regulation. In the installation, however, control is neither centralized nor absolute. The viewer initiates movement, but the resulting animation is mediated by sensors, microcontrollers, motors, mechanical linkages, and the physical limitations of the apparatus. Human intention is translated into machine behavior, producing outcomes that are responsive but not entirely predictable. The work therefore complicates the familiar relationship between operator and instrument: the viewer controls the system, but the system also determines the terms through which that control becomes possible.
1. The Politics of Representation: Reanimating the American West
The use of Frederick Remington’s imagery introduces a historical and cultural dimension that extends beyond the installation’s technical operation. Remington’s paintings helped establish a recognizable visual vocabulary of the American West, populated by cowboys, soldiers, horses, Indigenous figures, and frontier encounters. These images are not simply neutral records of historical events; they participate in the construction of a cultural mythology in which the West becomes a landscape of conflict, conquest, freedom, individualism, and expansion.
By extracting figures from their original painted compositions and placing them within a mechanical system, Kazemzadeh disrupts the authority of the original image. The figures no longer remain fixed within the artist’s carefully composed scenes. Instead, they become independent mechanical actors whose movements are determined by the presence and behavior of contemporary viewers.
This displacement raises questions about the relationship between representation and historical interpretation. When a figure is removed from its original context, what happens to the meaning it once carried? Does the character retain its historical and cultural associations, or does its new movement generate an alternative narrative? The installation makes these questions tangible by transforming historical imagery into a system of changing relationships.
There is also an important tension between the apparent freedom of movement and the limitations of the source material. Although the figures can move in different directions and at different speeds, they remain fragments of an established visual narrative. Their movement does not erase the history embedded in their imagery; rather, it exposes how representations can be rearranged, manipulated, and reconsidered.
The installation thus invites a critical distinction between the historical American West and the West as an image constructed through popular culture. It suggests that cultural narratives are not fixed historical truths but representational systems that can be examined and reconfigured.
2. The Illusion of Control: Human Agency and Technological Mediation
One of the central philosophical questions in Controlling the Wild West concerns the nature of agency. The installation appears to offer viewers direct control over the movement of the figures. Their physical positions and gestures activate the system, creating an immediate relationship between bodily action and mechanical response.
However, this relationship is not direct. The viewer does not physically move the figures. Instead, the body is detected by ultrasonic rangefinders, translated into electronic signals, interpreted by microcontrollers, and converted into movement through servo motors. Between intention and consequence exists an entire technological infrastructure.
This process reveals a fundamental characteristic of interactive media: human agency is increasingly exercised through systems of mediation. The viewer’s body becomes an input, the microcontroller becomes an interpreter, and the motor becomes an actuator. What appears to be an immediate act of control is actually a sequence of translations.
The installation makes this mediation visible rather than concealing it. The motors, dowel rods, sensors, wires, and mechanical connections remain exposed. Consequently, the viewer can begin to understand the relationship between action and response as a constructed process rather than an invisible technological phenomenon.
This transparency introduces an important philosophical question: Are we controlling the machine, or are we learning to behave in ways that the machine can recognize?
The distinction is significant. The installation responds only to movements that its sensors can detect and its programmed logic can interpret. The viewer’s agency is therefore enabled and constrained by the architecture of the system. The work becomes a small-scale model of a broader technological condition in which individuals interact with increasingly complex systems whose rules and possibilities are established before participation begins.
3. Embodiment, Presence, and the Spatialization of Interaction
The installation also offers a phenomenological investigation into the relationship between the body and the experience of space.
In conventional visual art, the viewer often occupies a relatively stable position outside the artwork, observing an image or object from a distance. In Controlling the Wild West, that relationship changes. The viewer’s body becomes an active component of the installation. Movement through the exhibition space is no longer incidental to the experience; it becomes the means through which the work is activated.
This shift resonates with phenomenological understandings of perception, particularly those associated with Maurice Merleau-Ponty, who argued that the body is not merely an object situated in space but the fundamental means through which the world is experienced. Perception is embodied, relational, and shaped by movement.
Within the installation, space becomes something the viewer encounters through action and consequence. Moving closer, stepping away, changing position, or crossing the space can produce different mechanical responses. The viewer begins to perceive the environment not simply as a container for the artwork but as a responsive field of relationships.
This creates a reciprocal relationship between body and environment. The viewer influences the installation, while the installation provides feedback that influences the viewer’s subsequent movement. A cycle emerges:
- The viewer moves through space.
- The sensors register the viewer’s position.
- The electronic system translates that information.
- The mechanical figures respond.
- The viewer observes the response and adjusts their movement.
The resulting interaction is neither entirely predetermined nor entirely free. It is an ongoing negotiation between bodily intention and technological response.
The installation therefore proposes that perception is not simply the passive reception of visual information. It is an active process in which the body participates in producing the conditions of what can be seen and experienced.
4. The Viewer as Performer, Operator, and Co-Author
A further philosophical dimension emerges through the transformation of the viewer’s role. The traditional distinction between artist, artwork, and audience becomes less stable as viewers begin to influence the installation’s behavior.
The viewer is simultaneously an observer, performer, operator, and participant in the production of meaning. Yet this participation does not necessarily make the viewer a co-author in the conventional sense. The artist establishes the system’s parameters, selects the imagery, constructs the mechanical relationships, and determines the conditions under which interaction occurs. The viewer operates within that designed framework.
This creates a productive tension between authorship and participation. The artist authors the conditions of possibility, while the viewer produces particular experiences and configurations within those conditions. Each encounter can therefore differ according to the number of viewers, their positions, their movements, and the timing of their interactions.
The work shifts artistic authorship away from the production of a singular, fixed composition and toward the design of a system capable of generating variable outcomes.
This approach anticipates a broader concern in interactive and computational art: the artwork is not necessarily a completed object but a set of relationships that become perceptible through participation. Its identity resides partly in the apparatus and partly in the events that unfold through its use.
The viewer does not merely complete the artwork. The viewer reveals its potential.
5. Narrative as a Dynamic and Unstable System
The movement of Remington’s figures also transforms the installation into an experiment in narrative construction.
In a conventional painting, relationships between characters, objects, and environments are established through composition. The artist determines where figures appear, what they are doing, how they relate to one another, and where the viewer’s attention is directed. The resulting image presents a relatively stable narrative arrangement.
In Controlling the Wild West, these relationships become unstable. Figures extracted from their original compositions move independently, at varying speeds and rhythms. Their actions can suggest new relationships, interrupt existing ones, or produce unexpected juxtapositions.
The installation therefore moves from the representation of a completed narrative toward the generation of narrative possibilities.
This distinction is important because narrative is not simply contained within the individual figures. It emerges through the relationships among them, their spatial arrangements, their movements, and the viewer’s interpretation. When those relationships change, the meaning of the scene changes as well.
The work suggests that narrative is not always a fixed sequence of events but can be understood as a system of relationships continually reconstructed through perception.
There is also an intriguing contrast between the historical authority of the original paintings and the apparent disorder of the animated installation. The figures retain their recognizable identities, but their new movements unsettle the visual coherence of the scenes from which they were taken. The result is a form of mechanical re-editing in which the original narrative is neither fully preserved nor entirely discarded.
6. Transparency, Demystification, and the Materiality of Technology
A particularly important aspect of the installation is the decision to expose its technical and mechanical processes.
Rather than concealing the apparatus behind a polished interface or presenting the animation as an apparently autonomous event, the installation reveals the physical mechanisms responsible for its operation. The viewer can see the sensors, motors, rods, structural supports, and electronic components.
This decision has both aesthetic and philosophical implications.
First, it challenges the tendency to experience technology as something immaterial or mysterious. Digital systems often conceal their physical infrastructure behind seamless interfaces. Users encounter an apparently effortless experience without seeing the hardware, programming, or material processes that make it possible.
By exposing these components, Controlling the Wild West restores visibility to the mechanisms of technological production. The work makes its own construction part of its content.
Second, the visible apparatus creates an opportunity for viewers to understand the relationship between cause and effect. They can observe how their movements activate sensors, how electronic signals influence motors, and how mechanical motion produces visual consequences. The installation becomes an experiential demonstration of technological processes.
Third, this transparency challenges the separation between artistic experience and technical understanding. The viewer is not required to accept the installation as a mysterious technological object. Instead, the work invites curiosity about how it functions and how it was constructed.
The materials themselves reinforce this position. Wood, dowel rods, coat hangers, office clips, foam board, dirt, and a steel bowl exist alongside microcontrollers, rangefinders, and servo motors. The combination of everyday materials and electronic components resists a distinction between high technology and ordinary fabrication. It suggests that technological creativity can emerge through experimentation, improvisation, and the recombination of available materials.
In this respect, the installation makes the process of making visible as an integral part of the artistic experience.
7. Social Space and the Negotiation of Shared Agency
The installation’s interaction also extends beyond the relationship between an individual viewer and a technological object. Because multiple viewers can occupy the space, their movements can influence the same mechanical environment.
The installation consequently becomes a social interface.
One person’s movement may activate a figure while another person’s position changes the conditions under which a different figure responds. Viewers may become aware of one another through the mechanical consequences of their presence. Their actions are no longer isolated events; they occur within a shared environment in which individual gestures can affect the experience of others.
This introduces questions about collective agency, spatial negotiation, and social behavior. Who is controlling the installation when several people are present? How does one viewer’s movement affect another’s experience? Can the actions of multiple participants produce an emergent choreography that no single participant fully directs?
The installation does not necessarily provide definitive answers. Instead, it establishes conditions in which these questions can be experienced.
The social dimension is especially significant because the work transforms the act of looking into an act of participation. Viewers become conscious not only of the artwork but also of their own positions relative to other people. The installation makes presence consequential.
In this sense, the work anticipates concerns that would become increasingly important in interactive environments, responsive architecture, and networked systems: the relationship between individual agency and collective behavior, and the ways technological interfaces organize interactions among people.
8. A Precursor to Contemporary Concerns in Interactive and Responsive Media
Viewed within the broader history of interactive media art, Controlling the Wild West occupies an interesting conceptual territory between kinetic sculpture, sensor-based installation, physical computing, and participatory art.
Its use of ultrasonic rangefinders and microcontrollers establishes a direct relationship between spatial sensing and mechanical movement. Rather than treating computation as a means of producing images on a screen, the work translates computational processes into physical events.
This is significant because it positions computation as a material and spatial medium. Information is not merely displayed; it is converted into movement, rhythm, and changes in the physical environment.
The installation also raises questions that remain relevant to contemporary interactive technologies:
- How do technological systems translate human presence into data?
- What aspects of human behavior become visible or actionable through sensing?
- How do interfaces establish the boundaries of participation?
- How does a system’s programming influence the behavior it appears to enable?
- What happens when individual actions become part of a shared computational environment?
Although the installation is rooted in the technologies and materials available in 2006, its conceptual concerns extend into contemporary discussions of responsive environments, human-computer interaction, surveillance, algorithmic mediation, and embodied interfaces.
Its importance lies not in anticipating any single later technology, but in making visible a fundamental relationship between human movement, computational interpretation, and the physical world.
9. The Paradox of Controlling the Wild
Ultimately, the title Controlling the Wild West can be read as an ironic proposition.
The installation appears to offer viewers control over a collection of Western characters. Yet the more they interact with the system, the more apparent it becomes that control is distributed among multiple forces: the viewer’s body, the sensors’ detection range, the microcontroller’s programming, the motors’ mechanical limitations, the arrangement of the figures, and the presence of other viewers.
The system is responsive, but it is not infinitely flexible. The viewer’s actions are meaningful, but they are mediated. The figures move, but they cannot escape the mechanical structures that govern their movement. The historical images are reconfigured, but they remain connected to the cultural narratives from which they originated.
The installation therefore presents control not as a singular act of domination but as a negotiated relationship among bodies, machines, images, and environments.
The notion of the wild becomes particularly interesting in this context. What appears uncontrolled may simply be something whose rules are not yet understood. Conversely, what appears controlled may conceal complex systems of mediation and constraint. The installation makes this tension visible by allowing viewers to experience both the apparent power and the limitations of their own actions.
The work ultimately asks viewers to consider whether control is ever absolute, or whether it is always an arrangement of relationships in which agency is shared, constrained, and continually renegotiated.
Concluding Interpretation
Controlling the Wild West is more than a kinetic installation or an interactive experiment in motion sensing. It is an investigation into the relationships among representation, agency, embodiment, technology, and social experience. By extracting figures from Frederick Remington’s paintings and animating them through the movements of viewers, Kazemzadeh transforms a historically fixed visual narrative into a responsive environment in which meaning is continually reconstructed.
The work brings together several seemingly disparate domains: the mythology of the American frontier, the physicality of human movement, the logic of electronic control systems, the materiality of mechanical construction, and the social dynamics of shared space. These domains do not simply coexist; they influence one another through the installation’s operation.
Its philosophical contribution lies in making the normally invisible structures of interaction perceptible. The viewer encounters technology not as an abstract or autonomous force but as a material system that translates human presence into action. At the same time, the viewer discovers that participation is never entirely unrestricted: every interaction occurs within a framework of possibilities established by the artist and embodied in the apparatus.
In doing so, Controlling the Wild West proposes an understanding of interactive art as a space of negotiated agency. The artwork does not merely respond to the viewer; it reorganizes the viewer’s relationship to images, space, technology, and other people. Its narrative is not fixed, its movement is not entirely predetermined, and its meaning is not exhausted by its physical components.
The installation ultimately transforms the act of viewing into an encounter with the conditions of control itself. It asks not only how people can activate machines, but how machines, images, and designed environments shape the ways people perceive, move, interact, and understand the world.